| For Instructional Support Faculty, September 2009
|
| 1. What is a dossier? |
The dossier is your documentation of and self-assessment of your
instructional support activities and overall job performance as an
instructional support faculty member. You are required to assemble and
submit the dossier to your Division Personnel Committee in support of your
application for reappointment, tenure or promotion. It is a qualitative
assembling or collection of evidence of your instructional support
activities and other professional development activities. It brings
together in one place, materials documenting your strengths, weaknesses,
accomplishments, and goals in the area of instructional support as well as
providing information about your other professional activities.
|
| 2. What is its purpose? |
Its primary purpose is to provide you and your peers with an opportunity
to reflect on your instructional support activities and other professional
activities in a systematic way. Its other purposes are: to improve job
performance; to encourage improvement strategies at the individual and
divisional levels; to enhance the profile of the support of instruction in
the overall evaluation process for personnel decision-making. Your dossier
should reflect the community colleges' emphasis on teaching and learning,
and the value of instructional support in the overall faculty evaluation
process.
|
| 3. Who evaluates it? |
Your peers on your Division Personnel Committee (also, your Tenure and
Promotion Review Committee in the case of a tenure and/or promotion
application), your Division Chair, your Dean, the Dean of Academic
Affairs, and the Chancellor.
|
| 4. How do I go about preparing it? |
The following steps for preparing your dossier are presented here as
simple, helpful suggestions rather than as prescriptive (you have to
do it) steps:
- Clearly state your philosophy and responsibilities:
Briefly state your philosophy. Describe your individual approach or style.
In other words, how do you communicate with teaching faculty and students.
There often exists between colleagues in your division (or subject area)
an informal understanding concerning responsibilities and criteria for
success. You might summarize these understandings in a short paragraph or
two. Where such an understanding does not exist, you should include a
brief statement of your own assumptions concerning your professional
responsibilities and obligations.
- Select items for inclusion in your dossier that
demonstrate effective job performance:
A list of the possible items that you might include in your dossier is
presented in Question 5. Paying close attention to your statement
philosophy/style in Step 1, you should select those items which are most
applicable to you and prepare a statement about your accomplishments in
each area. Your item choices will reflect your personal preference and
style.
- Present the items in your dossier in an orderly manner
with first priority/emphasis given to instructional
support:
Materials in your dossier should be arranged in a manner that makes your
dossier clear and easy to evaluate. The arrangement should emphasize
instructional support and your personal/professional emphasis, focus, or
goals. For example, if you wish to demonstrate improvement, entries that
in the short run lead to improvements could be emphasized.
- Compile the documentation:
You should keep copies of all printed items referred to in your dossier.
These materials are not part of the dossier, but are back-up information
in case "original" evidence is requested by your Division Personnel
Committee. The most important and relevant materials in support of your
dossier could be put into an appendix that could be submitted along with
your dossier. These appendix materials might include letters from your
division chair and students.
- (Optional) Add exemplary materials to your dossier:
You might include a few pages of materials which illustrate some of the
major evidence referred to in your dossier. For example, unsolicited
letters of praise from students, professional or community groups might
well be worth including in your dossier. The advisability of this step
depends on your personal preference, but it is likely to be especially
important when you are confronting a major personnel evaluation such as
tenure or promotion.
|
| 5. What should my dossier include? |
There is no single correct recipe for preparing your dossier. Since
it is a highly personalized product, like a fingerprint, no two are
exactly alike. For teaching faculty, it is highly recommended that
student evaluations be included in your dossier. But, a good dossier
will normally contain items from the following three broad areas: (1)
the products of good teaching, (2) materials from oneself, and (3)
information from others. Here is a suggested list of items
that you might include in each of these areas.
- Materials From Oneself - Descriptive
materials on your current responsibilities and practices
- List of instructional support materials prepared for
teaching faculty and students.
- Information on your availability to teaching faculty
and students.
- Summary of steps taken to identify problems and to
design procedures which alleviate problems.
- Summary of steps taken to encourage faculty and
student use of instructional support facilities and progrms.
- Description of how computers, audio-visual equipment,
or other non-print materials are used in your instructional support.
- Steps taken to emphasize the interrelatedness and
relevance of instructional support.
- Materials From Oneself - Description of steps taken to
evaluat and improve one's overall job performance.
- A reflective statement of your teaching philosophy and contribution
to the teaching mission of the Division and College.
- A personal statement describing your professional
goals for the next five years.
- Description of steps taken to improve resulting from
self-evaluation.
- Reading journals on improving instructional support
and attempting to implement acquired ideas.
- Reviewing new instructional support materials for
possible application.
- Exchanging instructional supportmaterials with a
colleague from another institution.
- Conducting research contributing directly to
instructional support.
- Becoming involved in an association or society concerned with the
improvement of instructional support and the improvement
of teaching and learning.
- Attempting instructional support innovations and
evaluating their effectiveness.
- Using general support services such as the Faculty Development
Committee or the Faculty Development Resource Center to search out
materials for improving your job performance.
- Participating in seminars, workshops, and professional meetings
intended to improve your job performance.
- Participating in course or curriculum development.
- Pursuing a line of research that contributes directly
to your instructional support.
- Preparing a textbook, pamphlet or other instructional
support materials.
- Editing or contributing to a professional journal on
instructional support.
- Information From Students:
- Student course and teaching evaluation data which suggest improvements
or produce an overall rating of effectiveness or
satisfaction with your instructional support work.
- Unstructured (and possibly unsolicited) written evaluations by
students, including written comments and letters received.
- Documented reports of student satisfaction with
professional
contacts with you (e.g. student advising).
- Interviews or evaluations collected from students who
attended an instructional support workshops you might have conducted.
- Honors received from students, such as a nomination or award for
"excellence."
- Information From Colleagues:
- Statements from colleagues who have observed your job
performance, either
as members of a faculty committee or as independent
observers of a particular insturctional support workshop that you might
have conducted for faculty or students.
- Statements from colleagues (or a community advisory group) who have
systematically reviewed the instructional support
materials/programs that you have adopted.
- Written comments from those who teach courses for
which you provide special instructional support services.
- Evaluation of contributions to curriculum/course development and
improvement.
- Statements from colleagues from other institutions.
- Honors or recognition, such as a distinguished service
award.
- Requests for advice or acknowledgement of advice
received from colleagues or students.
- Statements from colleagues recognizing your contribution to the
academic community.
- List of activities undertaken as a member of various faculty
committees.
- Information From Other Sources:
- Statements about teaching achievements from administrators at
one's own institution or other institutions.
- Alumni ratings or graduate feedback.
- Comments from parents of students.
- Reports from employers of students (e.g., in work-study or internship)
- Invitations to conduct workshops from other
colleges or outside agencies.
- Professional recognition/awards; invitations to present a paper
at a conference.
- Other kinds of invitations based on one's professional
reputation
(e.g., a media interview on a successful innovation).
- Statements from non-academic community organizations recognizing
your contribution or service.
|
| 6. How much information is needed?
|
There is no simple answer to this question. It should be a minimum
amount that fairly represents your teaching and overall job performance.
Experience suggests that a maximum of 4-8 pages plus supporting
appendix materials should be sufficient. Keep in mind that your
dossier is a living document that changes over time. You will be
adding new items and removing other items.
|
| 7. Where do I get help in
preparing my dossier? |
- Other faculty: your division chair or a trusted colleague in your
division, program, or subject area.
- A dossier preparation workshop featuring faculty who are willing
to share their suggestions and helpful hints (these workshops are
organized by the Faculty Development Committee).
- Model Dossiers located in the library (ask at the front desk).
- Other faculty members writing dossiers at the same time. People
collaborating in groups can be very beneficial -- and others can help
make the task enjoyable.
- The Faculty Development Coordinator (Jerry Cerny) by phone
(Ext.
215), e-mail (jerry@hcc.hawaii.edu), or
mailbox. Jerry can help you obtain information about linking up
with
faculty who have volunteered to serve as dossier consultants or to
obtain answers to specific questions.
|
| Conclusion |
These sources of help are meant to provide you with assistance in the
preparation of your dossier. Ultimately, the burden of the work
involved in preparing and writing your dossier falls on you and
requires your careful attention, time, and effort. It is best to
keep good records of activities, materials, and thoughts as you go
through the year. When it comes time to write the dossier, you will
have items ready to jog your memory and to include. Also, you should
start writing the dossier well in advance of its due date. Writing it
all a week or a weekend before it is due will probably result in a
document you will be disappointed in later. If it is written entirely
at the last minute, it will also probably interfere with your performance
in the classroom.
In summary, your dossier is not simply a tool to make you look good to
your Division Personnel Committee and others. It is a careful, thoughtful
gathering of materials that demonstrate your self-evaluation and
evaluation by others of your effectiveness in providing instructional
support and overall job performance. Preparing your dossier will force
you to think about the effectiveness, think about your personal
instructional support activities activities, rearrange your priorities,
rethink your strategies, think about ways to improve your effectiveness,
and plan for the future. It may seem like a real chore, but its principal
effect should be that of improving your instructional support and job
performance -- and that should make it more than worthwhile. Approached
correctly, it can be very educational -- and enriching.
|
| Sources |
- Office of Instructional Development and Technology, Dalhousie University,
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
- Center For Teaching Excellence, University of Hawaii at Manoa
- The Teaching Professor (October 1991).
|