Chapter Four
The Rise of the Prussian State


One of the most remarkable stories of political development in the 17th and 18th centuries was the rise of a new power - the Kingdom of Brandenburg-Prussia. Brandenburg, with its capital in Berlin, was one state in the confusing mix of petty German states which made up Central Europe. Ruled by the Hohenzollern family line, Brandenburg was a prominent German state in part due to its status as an "elector" state.

 

Remember, the Holy Roman Emperor was selected by the "Elector" or leader of seven key, identified elector states (seven privileged with this task, out of the hundreds of German states in the Holy Roman Empire confederation). Thus, the ruler of Brandenburg was not called prince or king - his title was ‘Elector’.  In 1618, Brandenburg absorbed the strategic Eastern (Baltic) territory of Prussia (capital was Koningsberg); this gave the state critical access to the Baltic coastline, bringing it into direct competition with Russia and Sweden.  (see map)

Brandenburg-Prussia (later called just Prussia), faced all the limits of the other small German states. It was limited in terms of territory, and thus resources. Agriculture in the region was not impressive, much of this territory had only marginal soil. It was also a small state in terms of population, thus only providing a limited pool for military service and a minimal tax base. Prussia’s limited engagement in the Commercial Revolution was clearly evident; the middle class was small, weak, and subservient. The dominant group in Prussia was one of the most oppressive, arch-conservative aristocracies in all of Europe, the Junker class (pronounced “yunker”). In addition, there were the obvious logistical problems of a state divided into two non-contiguous regions. This situation limited power and unity until resolved by absorbing the territories between.

THE GREAT ELECTOR

Offsetting these limitations, what Prussia did have was a series of very committed, effective and insightful leaders. As we saw in Sweden (and with the negative example of Poland), leadership made an enormous difference.  The first influential leader who recognized opportunities if Prussia mobilized and maximized its resources was the Hohenzollern leader Duke Frederick William I, the Great Elector of Brandenburg-Prussia (ruled 1640-1688).

During the course of the Thirty Years War, and based on the settlement of the Peace of Westphalia, Frederick William I came to two key conclusions.  1) The Austrian Habsburgs would never be able to play a dominant role in German state affairs.  2) In the world of small, petty, squabbling German armies, if one state could create and marshal an advanced, disciplined force, that state could become a dominant force.  Frederick William I devoted his rule to turning Prussia into a tightly unified state with all resources devoted to the strength and influence of the state.  The goal was the creation of an impressive "hard state" to enable competition with neighbors. Frederick William I set in motion state policies continued by his successors which led to the creation of absolutist control over Prussia, and the focusing of all the country’s resources towards the goal of creating a military force that was not always the most numerous on the field, but was in virtually every case the best.

Between the time he took power in 1640 and his death in 1688, Frederick William I expanded the Prussia army from 6,000 to 30,000 men. He also made the shift from a reliance on mercenary troops to the creation a truly professional, standing army, renowned for its discipline, training and instilled culture of sacrifice and obedience. This army was made up of drafted soldiers (primarily peasants); unlike the situation in most militaries of the time, a great deal of attention give to their training. The army was led by an aristocratic officer class made up exclusively of aristocratic Junker families.

A key precedent was set here. Frederick William I succeeded in establishing the cultural emphasis in the Prussian elite, the conviction that it was their duty and *privilege* to enter into military service. The idea took firm hold in Prussian culture, the concept that officer service in the army was a privileged role, the fulfillment of highest status for the Junker class.  Well into the 20th century, in WWI and WWII, the German officer corps was still dominated by those of aristocratic, Junker bloodlines, identified by the "von" in front of their name.

The Great Elector also established the organization to sustain this military build up, creating an efficient bureaucratic state with the principle focus being the collection of taxes to pay for this army. As in all absolutist states, the crushing burden was placed squarely on the shoulders of the peasants and small middle class. He created an absolutist state in every sense of the word.  He eliminated any potential check by the Junker class, buying them off with privileges (tax, legal, job).  He also relied on prescriptive mercantile policies to direct the economy.  Economic dominance remained in the hands of the land-owning Junker class, supported by the powers of the state. In fact, by state law, only the Junker class could own land! Junker dominance included enforcing unchecked control over the oppressed and impoverished peasants.  As in Austria, Prussian monarchs bought off the powerful aristocracy, given almost free reign to control and dominate the peasants and serfs. This clearly eliminated any possibility or hope for economic mobility on the part of the poor agricultural classes. The lives of Prussian peasants were abysmal.

Frederick William I began the slow build up of a merchant marine force in the Baltic. There was limited investment of small-scale industry, funded by and directed by the state; the focus was predictably on production of weaponry and means for transporting troops. In short, all mechanisms and powers of the state were directed towards development and support of military power. One interesting distinction in this Prussian version of absolutism was the lack of emphasis on religion. Although Prussia was a Protestant state, there was little emphasis by Hohenzollern leaders on imposing one kind of religion at home or as a basis of foreign policy. Thus, Hohenzollerns were, in general, politiques.

The Great Elector set in motion the creation of Prussian war machine, establishing the precedent for Prussia to act as an influential participant in European wars, alliances and diplomacy. The fruition of these plans was rapidly demonstrated as Prussia played an increasingly pronounced role in the final years of the Thirty Years War, gaining the strategic Baltic coastline of Pomerania as its reward.

Prussia continued to jump into ongoing inter-German state wars, lending its respected and desired military power to carefully chosen allies, and then acquiring additional territory in post-war settlements. Ultimately, once Prussia felt strong enough to challenge Austrian control and presence, it began to encroach on the German territorial presence of Austria, for example taking the rich province of Silesia. (see map) As clear reflection of the militaristic direction of foreign policy, recognize that Prussia was involved in a war over 1 / 2 the time Elector Frederick William I ruled.

In terms of foreign policy, an important pattern established by the middle of the 17th century was Prussia's confrontation with Slavic based powers, Poland and Russia. In fact, part of the "pitch" Prussia often made to other German states regarding the importance of Prussia’s leadership, was the need to accept this domineering role since German states had to protect themselves *under the leadership of the Prussian state* from the threat of Slavic expansion. The territory of Prussia is an Eastern territory, in direct proximity to the growing power of Russia. Hostility towards Russia was a long-standing traditional attitude, deeply imbedded in Prussian diplomacy, military policy and the culture; an underlying Prussian belief was the fear that the greatest threat to German culture as exemplified by Prussia was the great Slavic land power to the East.  Initially this was Poland, till it was defeated and carved up. Then began a centuries-long stand off with Russia.

The resulting Prussian culture set in motion by the Great Elector and continued by his able successors was a state based on absolutist rule and a culture of militarism. All aspects of the state were directed towards Prussia's military power, military build up, military values. There was little or no emphasis on commercial ventures and very little emphasis on the aesthetic aspects of culture in areas such as art, literature, music. In fact, works of art, literature, music – all reflected Prussian militarism; the dominant themes were warfare, military valor, the past glories of Rome, the Teutonic Knights or Charlemagne. Values such as self-sacrifice, duty to the state, and obedience of one’s superior officer or class became the cultural values extolled in popular and high culture, taking deep root and influencing German culture for the next several centuries.

CHANGE IN TITLE

The Hohenzollern leaders that followed Frederick William I sustained and built on this direction.  Let’s trace through the chronology of Hohenzollern rulers, because it becomes a bit confusing with this dynasty.

Elector Frederick William I:  1640-1688

Elector Frederick III:  1688-1713 (Elector – 1688-1701; King 1701-1713)

During his reign, as a reflection of the growing power of Prussia, Elector Frederick III sought and received from Austrian leaders (as head of the Holy Roman Empire) the right to take on a more powerful title, that of King in Prussia . The title, note, was not King *of* Prussia; Austria was still intent on limiting the authority of the Hohenzollerns. Frederick III began to use that title, and then changed his dynastic name in 1701. From this point on, then, the names and numbers of Hohenzollerns started over again since they were now kings, not just Electors.

So Elector Frederick III BECAME King Frederick I, King in Prussia!  He was then succeeded by...

King Frederick William I:  1713 -1740

King Frederick II (the Great):  1740-1786

 

FREDERICK THE GREAT

Frederick the Great is widely viewed as the most successful of the Hohenzollern kings. He continued and cemented the martial emphasis of the Prussian state. He directly and successful confronted Austria, seizing key territories from this rival state. Under his leadership, Prussia became not just a major Central European power, but one of the greatest military powers in all of Europe. Prussia remained actively involved in and usually victorious in the wars that raged throughout the 18th century (addressed in full in Unit 11).

Prussia's power was all the more remarkable because Prussias population was still relatively small (5 million total), however by focusing all energies, all resources towards military power, the Prussian army remained feared and respected by countries much larger. Frederick the Great was also a master of diplomacy. He exemplified many Machiavellian talents, readily entering and then breaking treaties and alliances, capitalizing on the weakness of his foes. He can  be seen as the political forefather of Otto von Bismarck who mastered the 19th century policy of Realpolitik.

Frederick the Great is a complex figure in history. He was not just a single-minded, narrowly focused military despot; he did institute some policies in his state that were, at least on the surface, progressive. He spent state monies to increase educational access and build educational institutions.  He decreased the use of violence and torture in the legal system, he institutionalized relatively tolerant religious policies. On closer inspection, however, many historians interpret these progressive actions as still a reflection of his primary emphasis.  There was increased education, but the curriculum was the study of war. There were policies to reduce strife (i.e. regarding religion) but this was so that energies were not spent on suppressing internal rebellion and could instead be directed towards external warfare. (see his essay on government)

The resulting militarism of Prussian society is clear by the end of his reign. Frederick took an army of 80,000 in 1740 and created what was for that time a massive army of 200,000 troops; and these were crack troops, highly trained and disciplined. Over 70% of all state revenues were directed towards military spending and purposes. The culture reflected the emphasis on marital values and heroes, extolling and teaching the youth ideals of discipline, unquestioning obedience of superiors and a strict hierarchy and chain of command in the army and in the society. Institutes of higher learning in Prussia were not focused on investigating areas of philosophy, history or ethics but rather the sciences of weapons and military science. By 1786, Prussia, by squeezing dry its people and conquered subjects, had the 4th largest army, and certainly the best trained forces, in all of Europe. Prussia also could boast of a rich treasury, and firmly established diplomatic and alliance-building expertise.

There was a price paid to achieve these advantages; this absolutist, militaristic state prevented meaningful development of a Commercial Revolution, suppressed the ambitions and contributions of a middle class, and the state rested heavily upon the exploitation of a deeply oppressed peasantry.  The arrogant and domineering Junker class was allowed to dominate social and economic live, and the culture contracted to a narrow emphasis on militaristic values, with little to balance this emphasis.

Down the road (in the 19th century), this rise of Prussia had another significant effect. When German nationalism was on the rise in the 19th century and fervent nationalists throughout the German states were calling for a unified Germany, they did not look to Austria for leadership since it was no longer seen as a German empire.  Rather, it was Prussia, led by the famous Junker Otto von Bismarck, which took on the role of unifying - finally - German Central Europe, in 1871. Prussia, in the 19th century, achieved what Austrian leaders had dreamed of doing for centuries, establishing rule over a powerful, unified German state.  The creation of the modern state of Germany in the later modern era was built directly on the foundations of the Prussian state created by major initiatives of the Great Elector and Frederick the Great. Prussia made its presence felt in the 17th century, and will remain a major player for the rest of our discussions of Europe.

Next week we move further East, tracing remarkable, distinctive and influential developments in the Balkans and in the massive, intriguing and complicated Russian empire.



BACK TO CHAPTER THREE
BACK TO UNIT NINE PAGE