CHAPTER ONE:
THE RADICAL PHASE OF THE FRENCH REVOLUTION


Last Unit, we traced the opening stages of the French Revolution, beginning with the liberal achievements National/Legislative Assembly achieved between 1789 - 1792. This period is referred to as the Liberal, Bourgeois or Middle Class phase of the revolution. During this "liberal" or "middle class" phase, France was transformed in a breathtakingly short space of time.  Revolutionary leaders dismantled parts of the entrenched Old Order society, in particular the structures resulting in severe repression and inequality; revolutionaries created a constitutional system with explicitly protected rights and equality under the law. In addition, by reducing the influence and protected status of the Catholic Church, revolutionary France became a more secular and tolerant society.  And yet, as we pick up the story in 1792, these achievements were not stable; revolutionary gains were still threatened.

The leaders of the new revolutionary Assembly in 1792 faced intense opposition and hostility from elites who lost their privileges.  There was also pressure from the frustrated poor who felt they had gained little from the revolution; in particular the mobilized urban poor (sans culottes) wanted more direct action to address issues of poverty.  These challenging forces pulled on this new government from above and below.  And critically, there was also the added strain of war; France after April 1792 was at war with a shifting coalition of conservative neighboring states. Under these cumulative pressures, radical leaders were able to take control of the revolution by asserting the need for dramatic responses to these threats; radical parties won a majority in elections in the fall of 1792. The French Revolution thus took a critical turn - becoming more radical and more violent.

RADICAL CHANGES

The radical phase of the revolution was a result of increased tensions.  By Fall 1792, the revolution seemed increasingly under threat. Conservative groups continued to openly demonstrate hostility and even treasonous behavior – even to the point of supporting and aiding the other countries at war with France! Revolutionary leaders and the san culottes were increasingly distrustful of these elite opponents.  The acute problems and the frustrations of the poor led to growing mob violence. The war was also going badly; France was losing ground on the battle fronts. All of these factors created an atmosphere of insecurity and distrust. In this turbulent environment, elections took place for the new legislative assembly; these elections included the voting participation of a large number from the lower classes. Delegates selected for the legislative assembly (now called the National Convention) in this highly-charged atmosphere espoused more radical and extreme views and goals.  The shift to the left was obvious in these elections. 

In September 1792, this revolutionary leadership took their first radical step - declaring the creation of a Republic. The monarchy was officially ended; the National Convention would rule alone. Revolutionary momentum then led to a trial of the now-obsolete monarch Louis XVI on charges of treason against the state and the revolution. He was found guilty; in a vivid indication of the radical turn the revolution had taken, Louis (and later Marie) were beheaded in early 1793.

The new French Republic was immediately caught up in a power struggle between two powerful factions - the Jacobin and Girondon parties.  By spring 1793, again in an atmosphere of violent public agitation and urban mass riots, the Jacobins consolidated their power under the leadership of men like George Jacques Danton and Maximilien Robespierre. In 1793 - 1794, the Jacobins pushed the revolution further, undertaking several policies aimed at completely redrawing French society. The brazen sense of righteousness and dramatic actions taken by the Jacobins represented extreme examples of Enlightenment thinking.  In many ways, they pushed the Enlightenment idea of reforming society to the furthest limit yet seen - going where no revolution had gone before.

RADICAL CHANGES

The Jacobins leading the National Convention felt that their future, and the future of the revolution as a whole, depended on the support of the poor masses. The justification was that the only way to defend against the threats of absolutist enemies within and on the borders of revolutionary France  was to fully mobilize the French masses - the poor - to create unified and loyal support for the revolutionary government.  So, to gain necessary popular support, and to carry out revolutionary and Enlightenment ideals, these leaders passed laws intended to answer the needs and demands of the poor - in particular the sans-culottes.

Jacobin policies targeted political as well as economic and social conditions, resulting in the most controversial and, in the long term, most influential consequences of the French revolution.   Based on Enlightenment belief in the ability of humans to directly restructure society, the Jacobin leadership attempted to redress deep and long standing problems of poverty and severe economic inequality.

POLITICAL POLICIES:


Initially, the radical leadership undertook to make the government not only constitutional, but truly democratic. The leaders formalized a system of  universal male suffrage. This was a truly radical step - all men were to vote, even if they owned no property.  This was the greatest extension of political power ever seen - far more democratic than voting rights in the United States at this time. However, even these radicals were not willing to extend the vote to women.

Even though later the property-less masses had this voting power taken away, the memory and example of mass democracy was an influential legacy of the Jacobin period.  Later radicals and revolutionaries all over the world continued to push for broader voting rights throughout the 1800's and into the 1900's.   Later, women suffragists will also push for true democracy in the long fight to gain the vote for women in liberal systems.

ECONOMIC POLICIES:


To address the dramatic economic differences in the country, the Jacobins seized land from aristocrats and redistributed this property to the peasants - to expand land ownership.  Although it was during the liberal phase that limited seizure and selling of land had begun; however, the Jacobins carried out an intensified and more conscious policy of redistributing wealth.  This massive property redistribution was dramatic and radical - going far beyond what classical liberals felt was an acceptable role of the state.

In the cities, responding to the desperate conditions of the sans-culottes, Jacobins implemented extreme state intervention, regulation and economic control.  A number of policies actively and directly addressed hunger and unemployment.

  • The radical government regulated prices and wages, forcibly seizing hoarded food from the countryside and rationing/distributing food to urban citizens.
  • Jacobin leadership directed government funding to small scale industries (to increase jobs) - in particular production of weaponry and arms for the war
  • Jacobins even tried to direct use of limited resources - for example passing laws forbidding the making of luxury foods such as wedding cakes and pastries!  It was felt that flour could better feed more of the masses in the form of simple bread (called the "bread of equality".)

 

This degree of state control (nationalization) of the economy went far beyond the mercantile policies under absolutism; the Jacobins were attempting to plan and coordinate the economy in the name of the state and the poor classes.

In short, in the cities and the countryside, the Jacobins went far beyond the limited role of government envisioned by classical liberal revolutionaries, creating the model of an interventionist, active government with the responsibility for alleviating social and economic problems and inequalities. These radical policies became the basis for later ideas of state control and responsibility which evolved into the influential ideology of  socialism. Socialism was born out of a radical desire to further transform society; revolutionary goals born out of the chaotic upheaval of the French Revolution.

SOCIAL POLICIES:


To move towards greater equality, there were other steps taken to eliminate age-old class distinctions.  French citizens were required to use informal language and to address all in their community as "citizen" rather than class based titles or names. They were supposed to wear more informal clothes; fancy frilled clothes became the mark of an 'anti-revolutionary'. Equality of education became a goal as well, leading to the influential policy of expanding educational access to rural areas and lower classes. The attempt to reduce class differences, and the goal of state-based expansion of educational opportunity to improve equality were also key Jacobin initiatives, and inspiration for later such movements throughout Europe and the world.

Many Jacobins (radical products of the Enlightenment) made clear they were not only hostile to the Catholic Church but to Christianity itself. Fervent, even militant secularism and even atheism on the part of key Jacobins resulted in a number of very controversial policies, including the confiscation of churches for public uses (i.e. schools and food storehouses). The calendar (with its Christian based holidays) was revised, using seasonal, nature-based names like Thermidor. To replace what radicals saw as the superstitious, conservative presence of Catholicism, Jacobin leaders attempted to create a new belief system, the Cult of Reason.  There were attempts to institute civic festivals celebrating reason, in place of religious festivals and traditions.  The Jacobins' anti-Catholic policies represented the extreme outcome of secular ideas of the Enlightenment.

OPPOSITION

Many in France became alienated by these radical policies.  The Jacobins came into power confronting many opposing groups who feared Jacobin rule - such as the aristocracy and the Church. By 1794, however, even more people were hostile to the revolutionary leadership headed by the Jacobins. Not only were the aristocrats and the Church actively opposed to Jacobin policies and the revolution (for obvious reasons), but hostile groups now included peasants, who were outraged by the atheistic and anti-Catholic policies of the government. The more moderate liberal middle class, which valued property rights and a limited government, was appalled by Jacobin economic policies of property seizure, regulation and redistribution.  Attempts to extend political power to the masses also alienated many liberals who did not believe in mass democracy.   By 1794, about the only group that still actively supported this revolutionary government was the urban poor.  This was hardly stable political ground for the Jacobin government.

FIGHTING THE WAR

Despite these problems, the Jacobins were able to demonstrate success in waging the still on-going war with outside powers.  Radical leaders had to contend with the *continued* danger from several conservative powers (Austria, Prussia and Russia in particular) who were threatening the borders of France.  Austria and other Old Order monarchs and elite powers who had felt threatened by the earlier liberal policies of the French Revolution certainly even more deeply hated the radical events in France occurring under the Jacobins.  In fighting the war to protect the gains of the revolution, Jacobin leaders did have some advantages.

1)  Due to the abolishment of aristocratic privileges in earlier years, military status and promotion in the French army was based primarily on merit rather than one's family status. Promotion in the French army, as a result, now reflected ability, not class. In the armies of Old Order powers such as Russia, officers were aristocrats who held positions based on bloodline and court connections, not merit.  Thus the officers in revolutionary France were those had ability, thus, on the whole, better qualified than the officers in Austrian and Russian armies. In fact the figure who ultimately took a leading role in this revolution (and who we will discuss next chapter) made his fame as a highly gifted officer who, after 1789, was able to rise through the ranks due to his ability - Napoleon Bonaparte. The elimination of the Old Order class-based restrictions made it possible for someone like Napoleon, lacking high aristocratic credentials, to demonstrate and gain power due to brilliance in leadership and strategy.

2)  French leaders in 1793-1794 further added to this military strength by using another advantage France had, a massive population.  Ending the tradition of a professional standing (smaller) army, the Jacobins instituted a citizens draft - the levee en masse. This put into the field an additional 800,000 soldiers to confront the combined strength of Old Order countries. This action proved to be a powerful, and deadly, precedent; mobilizing the whole country in war in the form of citizen armies was a revolutionary shift away from the traditional use of smaller, "professional" forces in limited wars.  The roots of later deadly and massive "total" wars of the 20th century with national, citizen armies can be traced directly back to these Jacobin policies whereby war was fought by the entire citizenry, directed by the state.
 

NATIONALISM

Using the strength of a citizen army required the Jacobins to undertake steps that would prove extraordinarily influential. Recognize, this radical government, which did not have popular political support, needed to mobilize citizens to fight and sacrifice in a war.  These drafted soldiers had to be given a reason to fight; they were not going to fight out of loyalty to the government, the Jacobins.  The reason communicated to these drafted troops was that they needed to fight "to protect the French as a nation and a people".  The revolutionary government, instead of asking for allegiance and loyalty to the specific government of France (the unpopular Jacobins) asked soldiers to demonstrate their loyalty to FranceFrance meant "the people"; drafted service was identified as necessary to defend the country, defined as the people of France.

The definition of France as meaning the people and citizens, (rather than the monarch or leader) led to persuasive and effective demands for sacrifice and loyalty of all people in the ongoing war. This shift marked the beginning of probably the most powerful, emotional ideology to emerge from the Age of Revolution - the modern concept of nationalism.

The emerging idea of national identity was a radical departure in that it cut across earlier concepts of identity; during the centuries of the Old Order, identity ("who I am") was closely linked to class, religion, and/or local region.  Traditionally, loyalty to the state meant loyalty to the leader (king/queen/emperor/tzar) since under absolutism, the state WAS the monarch.  However, these new appeals to nationalism asked those in France to feel connected and to fight for each other, a common, connected nation of citizens.  The state, the country was defined as the people.

Flags and songs created and used during the French Revolution, instead of honoring the king or dynasty, now represented and glorified the French people as a distinct and proud nation, a nation that had to fight other foreign peoples to protect their heritage and their revolution. A new French flag, created in the early stages of the revolution, replaced the earlier flag of France (the crest of the ruling Bourbon dynasty).  After 1789, the new flag consisted of three colors (blue, red and white) representing the different peoples of France. The first national anthem also emerged during the early years of the French Revolution. This anthem glorified the people, not, as previous anthems had done, the monarch.  La Marseillaise, written in 1793, was a revolutionary song honoring the peoples' fight against tyranny. (below is part of this first national anthem - still the national anthem of France today.)

Allons enfants de la Patrie                                 Let us go, children of the fatherland
Le jour de gloire est arriv.                                 Our day of Glory has arrived.
Contre nous, de la tyrannie,                              Against us stands tyranny,
L'etandard sanglant est lev,                                The bloody flag is raised,
l'etandard sanglant est lev,                                 The bloody flag is raised.
Entendez-vous, dans la compagnes.                   Do you hear in the countryside
Mugir ces farouches soldats                              The roar of these savage soldiers
Ils viennent jusque dans nos bras                       They come right into our arms
Egorger vos fils,                                               To cut the throats of your sons,
vos compagnes.                                                your country

Aux armes citoyens!                                          To arms, citizens!
Formez vos bataillons,                                       Form up your battalions
Marchons, marchons!                                        Let us march, Let us march!
Qu'un sang impur                                              That their impure blood
Abreuve nos sillons.                                           Should water our fields

 

The powerful, emotional force of unifying and mobilizing people based on a common conception of national identity and loyalty was one of the most important consequences of the French Revolution; we discuss the evolving ideals and dramatic implications of nationalism in later chapters. In the short term, recognize, nationalism enabled the unpopular leadership of Jacobin France to draft and send into the field hundreds of thousands of soldiers who fought with a passionate commitment.  They fought not for the Jacobins, but for "France". This emotional force, added to numbers and effective military leadership of men like Napoleon Bonaparte meant that France began to win the war against the anti-revolutionary, conservative coalition.

THE REIGN OF TERROR

Between 1792 - 1794, the Jacobin leadership attempted many extraordinarily radical changes in a very short space of time. The problem was, most of these changes were not supported by the majority of French citizens.  In response to increasing resistance, the revolutionary Jacobin government became more dictatorial, tightening its grip and ultimately resorting to mass executions to quiet those opposing their policies.  In a tragic pattern seen in many revolutions, to protect the earlier gains of the revolution, leaders became increasingly repressive to those who opposed their policies, becoming more authoritarian, arbitrary and brutal - and they ending up destroying many of the revolution's early achievements.

In the face of increased hostility, the Jacobin-controlled National Convention created a powerful executive committee to maintain control  - the Committee for Public Safety (also called the Committee of Twelve). In their impatience to stamp out counter-revolutionaries and obstacles to their revolutionary changes, this twelve man dictatorship ignored most of the newly acquired legal protections that protected the rights of French citizens.  "Trials" became a joke, as all those deemed 'anti-revolutionary' - whether untrustworthy aristocrats, hostile middle class citizens, and troublesome peasants and sans-culottes were found quickly and inevitably guilty of treason against the revolution - and executed by guillotine.

The use of state terror to hold onto revolutionary power reached its peak between Fall 1793 - Summer 1794.  Over these months, it estimated that over 40,000 French citizens were executed. While some of these people were undoubtedly hostile to the revolution and possibly were real threats, many victims of the Terror simply just did not display adequate obedience and support.  Questioning or criticizing Jacobin leaders became the definition of treason! (see Robespierre's justification)

This episode, where the leadership espousing the good and rights of the "people" was actually executing anyone who disagreed with its vision, is known as the Reign of Terror. The bloodshed and terror of this time came to represent for many the worst excesses of the French Revolution.   For conservative voices, it was proof of the danger of revolution and of extending power to the masses. For others, this descent into terror and repression was a tragic end of a positive radical promise and beginning. The Jacobin phase generated passionate responses in the 18th century - and still to the present day; some will continue to support the equalizing and socialist ideals and goals of the Jacobins (while criticizing its dictatorial methods); others will see this radical episode as proof of the need for slower change in a society.

Ultimately, the Terror turned on itself, " The Revolution devoured her own children." Internal tensions and competition between Committee of Public Safety leaders resulted in a flurry of accusations of treason and betrayal; they started attacking and even executing each other.  The revolutionary hero Danton was accused of treason by the more radical leaders Robespierre and St. Just, and executed in 1794. Just a few weeks later, Robespierre and St. Just were themselves executed when other members of the Committee of Public Safely turned against them.  After these executions, the radical Jacobin government collapsed. The radical phase was over, but the legacies echo to the present day.


Interesting Links

INTERNET SOURCES:  FRENCH REVOLUTION


GO TO CHAPTER TWO
BACK TO UNIT FIVE PAGE